The table shows the Top 10 passenger potential (based on Sabre GDD, one-way) from PER to Europe in the period 11/22-10/23. Applying the elimination method, the decision in favor of CDG is obvious: apart from LHR, which is already served, only Manchester Airport (MAN) and Dublin Airport (DUB) have a larger potential than CDG. However, both are already perfectly connected via LHR, especially since British Airways, a Oneworld alliance partner, operates out of LHR. The remaining competitors are clearly falling behind CDG.
Hubs of other Oneworld carriers (Madrid, Helsinki) do not appear in the top 10. In addition, the transfer share (beyond traffic) is negligible at 7%, even in the case of LHR as a Oneworld hub.
The table above also shows that, when comparing our top 10 in terms of current and pre-COVID levels, only CDG has already returned to pre-COVID demand, which indicates increased popularity. In contrast, some of CDG’s competitors still lag significantly behind pre-COVID levels; for instance, AMS has only achieved two-thirds of its pre-COVID demand so far.
Consideration of behind traffic & pre-COVID comparison
As mentioned earlier, beyond traffic only plays a minor role, at least for Qantas’ existing European connections. A different picture, however, appears when looking at the behind traffic (i.e. feeder traffic): in the passenger mix of PER-LHR the behind traffic makes up 58% of the total traffic, in the passenger mix of PER-FCO even 73%. When examining the O&D potential of Australia’s two busiest airports, namely Sydney Airport (SYD) and Melbourne Airport (MEL) (both potential behind airports of PER in terms of flight progression), a distinct overview emerges, as illustrated in the table below: